In response to my response I would first like to say that after class I found, in my opinion, that all six of the six parts of oration could be applied to rhetorical writing, that is after partition was explained in class as thinking about in parts, which could lend itself to a well organized paper, and peroration was explained as conclusion, and if one does not have some form of conclusion for their paper I have to wonder what they have been learning all their schooling years. I also mentioned us talking about the five cannons and three systems of rhetoric in class and in other readings, but did not mention that these were basically the same ideas sometimes by different names and presented by different rhetoricians; I was pointing out they were the same or at least similar but did not fully explain.
Well for my classmate response entry I do not really have anything considering I tried 7 different blogs (and that's only the actual blogs, not including people who have not yet caused the link to pop up for their blog) and found no postings for today's reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment